1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Advanced semiconductor packaging technologies - our scope |
1.2. | Semiconductor foundries and their roadmap |
1.3. | Challenges in transistor scaling |
1.4. | Chiplets: Use cases and benefits |
1.5. | Four key drivers for advanced semiconductor packaging technologies |
1.6. | Key markets for advanced semiconductor packaging |
1.7. | Evolution roadmap of semiconductor packaging |
1.8. | Moving towards 3D packaging: Pros and Cons |
1.9. | Four key factors of advanced semiconductor packaging |
1.10. | Overview of interconnection technique in semiconductor packaging |
1.11. | Overview of 2.5D packaging structure |
1.12. | Tech development trend for 2.5D packaging |
1.13. | Benchmark of materials for interposer |
1.14. | Interposer supplier landscape |
1.15. | Advanced Semiconductor packaging - technology benchmark overview (1) |
1.16. | Advanced Semiconductor packaging - technology benchmark overview (2) |
1.17. | Evolution of bumping technologies |
1.18. | Bumpless Cu-Cu hybrid bonding |
1.19. | Overview of devices that make use of hybrid bonding |
1.20. | Challenges in 3D Hybrid bonding |
1.21. | Key applications of 3D SoIC packages |
1.22. | The emergence of co-packaged optics (CPO) |
1.23. | Co-packaged optics - package structure |
1.24. | Future applications of Monolithic 3D |
1.25. | Data center accelerator: advanced semiconductor packaging unit forecast 2022-2034 (shipment) |
1.26. | Data center CPU: advanced semiconductor packaging unit forecast 2022-2034 (shipment) |
1.27. | Advanced semiconductor packaging unit forecast for APE (application processor environment) in consumer electronics 2022-2034 (1) |
1.28. | Advanced semiconductor packaging units in PC forecast 2022-2034 (1) |
1.29. | Advanced semiconductor packaging unit for 5G RAN networks 2022-2034 (Cumulative) |
2. | INTRODUCTION TO ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGING |
2.1. | Challenges in transistor scaling |
2.1.1. | The growing demand for data computing power |
2.1.2. | Fundamentals of abundant data computing system |
2.1.3. | Key parameter of growth for processor and memory (1) |
2.1.4. | Key parameter of growth for processor and memory (2) |
2.1.5. | Memory bandwidth deficit |
2.1.6. | Four key area of growth for abundance data computing system |
2.1.7. | Key parameters for transistor device scaling |
2.1.8. | Evolution of transistor device architectures |
2.1.9. | Scaling technology roadmap overview |
2.1.10. | Semiconductor foundries and their roadmap |
2.1.11. | The economics of scaling |
2.1.12. | Challenges in transistor scaling |
2.1.13. | The solution forward: chiplet + advanced semiconductor packaging |
2.2. | The rise of Chiplet |
2.2.1. | The rise of chiplets |
2.2.2. | What is chiplet technology |
2.2.3. | Use cases and benefits |
2.2.4. | AMD Chiplet performance vs cost |
2.2.5. | Advanced semiconductor packaging: The chiplet enabler |
2.3. | The rise of Advanced Semiconductor Packaging technologies |
2.3.1. | General electronic packaging - an overview |
2.3.2. | Advanced semiconductor packaging - an overview |
2.3.3. | The rise of advanced semiconductor packaging |
2.3.4. | The challenges of advanced semiconductor packaging and its challenges |
2.3.5. | Four key drivers for advanced semiconductor packaging technologies |
2.3.6. | Key figures of merit of advanced semiconductor packaging technologies |
3. | ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGING TECHNOLOGIES: DEEP-DIVE INTO 2.5D AND 3D PACKAGING |
3.1. | Introduction |
3.1.1. | Four key factors of advanced semiconductor packaging |
3.2. | Advanced semiconductor packaging technologies - overview of technologies |
3.2.1. | Evolution roadmap of semiconductor packaging |
3.2.2. | Semiconductor packaging - an overview of technology |
3.2.3. | Overview of interconnection technique in semiconductor packaging |
3.2.4. | Moving towards 3D packaging: Pros and Cons |
3.2.5. | Interconnection technique - Wire Bond |
3.2.6. | Interconnection technique - Flip Chip |
3.2.7. | Interconnection technique - Interposer |
3.2.8. | Passive vs active interposer |
3.2.9. | Interconnection technique - technology benchmark |
3.3. | 2.5D packaging |
3.3.1. | 2.5D packaging - introduction |
3.3.2. | 2.5D Packaging - benefits and challenges |
3.3.3. | Overview 2.5D semiconductor packaging technology |
3.4. | 2.5D Si-based packaging |
3.4.1. | 2.5D packaging that involves Si as interconnect |
3.4.2. | Interposer Structure |
3.4.3. | Through Si Via (TSV) - now and the future |
3.4.4. | Through-Si-Via (TSV) fabrication process flow |
3.4.5. | Through-Si-Via (TSV) fabrication method |
3.4.6. | SiO2 RDL fabrication |
3.4.7. | RDL layer thickness |
3.4.8. | 2.5D Si interposer: Complete process overview |
3.4.9. | Si Bridge |
3.4.10. | Si interposer vs Si bridge benchmark |
3.4.11. | Case studies |
3.4.12. | Players that have 2.5D Si-based packaging solutions |
3.4.13. | Developing trend for 2.5D Si-based packaging |
3.4.14. | Packaging challenges in 2.5D |
3.5. | 2.5D Organic-based packaging |
3.5.1. | 2.5D packaging - high density fan-out packaging |
3.5.2. | Key trends in fan-out packaging |
3.5.3. | Fan-out packaging process overview |
3.5.4. | Fan-out chip-first process flow |
3.5.5. | Fan-out chip-last process flow |
3.5.6. | Fan-out chip-last RDL formation - development trend |
3.5.7. | Challenges in future fan-out process |
3.5.8. | Limitations in organic substrate |
3.5.9. | Organic RDL |
3.5.10. | Key Factors to Consider When Choosing material for Electronic Interconnects |
3.5.11. | Electronic interconnects: SiO2 vs Organic dielectric |
3.5.12. | Key parameters for organic RDL materials for next generation 2.5D fan-out packaging |
3.6. | 2.5D glass-based packaging |
3.6.1. | Benefits of glass |
3.6.2. | Roles of glass in semiconductor packaging |
3.6.3. | Value proposition of glass as core material for 2.5D package |
3.6.4. | Overcoming Limitations of Si interposers with Glass |
3.6.5. | Glass core as interposer for advanced semiconductor packaging |
3.6.6. | Glass core (interposer) package - process flow |
3.6.7. | TGV - Player and products benchmark |
3.6.8. | TGV of >15 aspect ratio |
3.6.9. | Samtec TGV |
3.6.10. | Absolic's glass packaging solution |
3.6.11. | Achieving 2/2 um L/S on glass substrate |
3.6.12. | Eight metal layer RDL on glass process flow |
3.6.13. | <3 um micro via |
3.6.14. | 3D Glass Panel Embedding (GPE) package |
3.6.15. | 3D Glass Panel Embedding (GPE) package- process flow |
3.6.16. | Glass vs molding compound |
3.6.17. | GPE vs Glass interposer - 1 |
3.6.18. | GPE vs Glass interposer - specification benchmark |
3.6.19. | GPE vs Glass interposer - process benchmark |
3.6.20. | Glass - thermal management |
3.6.21. | RDL dielectrics on glass substrate |
3.6.22. | Glass interposer - more demonstrated case studies |
3.6.23. | Challenges of glass packaging |
3.7. | Technology Benchmark: Si vs Organic vs Glass |
3.7.1. | Benchmark of materials for interposer |
3.7.2. | Interposer supplier landscape |
3.7.3. | Advanced Semiconductor packaging - technology benchmark overview (1) |
3.7.4. | Advanced Semiconductor packaging - technology benchmark overview (2) |
3.8. | 3D Hybrid bonding |
3.8.1. | Conventional 3D packaging (No TSVs) |
3.8.2. | Advanced 3D Packaging (W/ TSVs) |
3.8.3. | Advanced 3D Packaging |
3.8.4. | Evolution of bumping technologies |
3.8.5. | µ bump for advanced semiconductor packaging |
3.8.6. | Challenges in scaling bumps |
3.8.7. | Bumpless Cu-Cu hybrid bonding |
3.8.8. | Cu-Cu hybrid bonding manufacturing process flow |
3.8.9. | Three ways of Cu-Cu hybrid bonding |
3.8.10. | Technology benchmark between 2.5D, 3D micro bump, and 3D hybrid bonding |
3.8.11. | Performance benchmark of devices based on micro bumps vs Cu-Cu bumpless hybrid bonding |
3.8.12. | Overview of devices that make use of hybrid bonding |
3.8.13. | Challenges in 3D Hybrid bonding |
4. | ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGING TECHNOLOGIES: PLAYER ANALYSIS |
4.1. | Introduction |
4.1.1. | Business value chain in IC industry |
4.1.2. | Ecosystem/Business model in the IC industry |
4.1.3. | Role and advantages of players in advanced semiconductor packaging market |
4.1.4. | Players in advanced semiconductor packaging and their solutions |
4.2. | TSMC's advanced semiconductor packaging solutions |
4.2.1. | TSMC's advanced semiconductor packaging technology portfolio |
4.2.2. | TSMC 2.5D packaging technology - CoWoS |
4.2.3. | CoWoS - development progress |
4.2.4. | Challenges in large interposer manufacturing and its solutions |
4.2.5. | CoWoS-L |
4.2.6. | CoWoS_L process flow |
4.2.7. | Fabrication of Local Si Interconnect (LSI) |
4.2.8. | Solutions to achieve > 4000 mm2 interposer area (1) |
4.2.9. | Solutions to achieve > 4000 mm2 interposer area (2) |
4.2.10. | Test vehicle results |
4.2.11. | TSMC CoWoS market |
4.2.12. | TSMC packaging facility overview |
4.2.13. | TSMC 2.5D packaging technology - InFO |
4.2.14. | TSMC 2.5D InFO packaging technologies roadmap |
4.2.15. | TSMC 2.5D packaging technology applications |
4.2.16. | TSMC 3D SoIC Technology |
4.2.17. | Roadmap of bond pitch scaling |
4.2.18. | How bonding pitch size affects system performance |
4.2.19. | Key Applications of 3D SoIC packages |
4.2.20. | Application examples of 3D SoIC packages |
4.2.21. | Combine 3D SoIC and 2.5D backend packaging technologies |
4.2.22. | TSMC's vision and strategies for advanced semiconductor packaging |
4.3. | Intel's advanced semiconductor packaging solutions |
4.3.1. | Intel's advanced semiconductor packaging technology portfolio |
4.3.2. | Introduction to Intel EMIB (Embedded Multi-Die interconnect Bridge) |
4.3.3. | EMIB process flow |
4.3.4. | EMIB process challenges |
4.3.5. | EMIB key parameters |
4.3.6. | EMIB bump size reduction roadmap |
4.3.7. | Products that use EMIB technology |
4.3.8. | Intel 3D FOVEROS technology |
4.3.9. | Intel 3D FOVEROS ODI |
4.3.10. | Intel's 3D FOVEROS roadmap highlights |
4.3.11. | Three key interconnect breakthroughs from Intel |
4.3.12. | Intel 3D FOVEROS Direct hybrid bonding - roadmap |
4.3.13. | Intel interconnect technology - Zero Misaligned Via (ZMV) |
4.3.14. | Table of Intel's products that adopts 3D FOVEROS |
4.3.15. | Intel Lakefield packaging insights |
4.3.16. | Intel Lakefield packaging teardown |
4.3.17. | Intel Ponte Vecchio packaging insights (1) |
4.3.18. | Intel Ponte Vecchio packaging insights (2) |
4.3.19. | Intel Ponte Vecchio - thermal management (1) |
4.3.20. | Intel Ponte Vecchio - thermal management (2) |
4.3.21. | Intel 3D packaging roadmap: Co-EMIB (2.5D+3D) |
4.3.22. | Intel advanced packaging roadmap overview |
4.3.23. | Intel glass packaging roadmap |
4.3.24. | Intel's test vehicle for glass packaging |
4.3.25. | Intel packaging sites |
4.4. | Samsung's advanced semiconductor packaging solutions |
4.4.1. | Samsung's advanced semiconductor packaging technology portfolio |
4.4.2. | Overview of Samsung's targeted applications |
4.4.3. | Samsung's advanced semiconductor packaging roadmap |
4.4.4. | Samsung's 2.5D packaging solutions (I-Cube) |
4.4.5. | Samsung RDL-first fan-out wafer/panel level package |
4.4.6. | 2.5D Molded Interposer on Substrate (MIoS) package |
4.4.7. | Samsung's 2.5D packaging solutions (H-Cube) |
4.4.8. | Fan-out packaging portfolio |
4.4.9. | FOPLP for HPC products? |
4.4.10. | Samsung's 3D packaging solutions |
4.4.11. | Samsung's Cu-Cu bonding |
4.4.12. | Packaging for high bandwidth memory (HBM) |
4.4.13. | HBM packaging transition to hybrid bonding |
4.4.14. | Remark on Samsung's advanced semiconductor packaging business |
4.4.15. | OSAT's advanced semiconductor packaging technologies |
4.5. | ASE's advanced semiconductor packaging solutions |
4.5.1. | ASE 2.5D technologies - FOCoS |
4.5.2. | ASE's VIPack (Advanced packaging solutions for heterogeneous integration) |
4.5.3. | FOCOS - Packaging spec benchmark |
4.5.4. | RDL spec benchmark (FOCOS vs Bridge vs Si interposer) |
4.5.5. | ASE FOCoS process flow (1) |
4.5.6. | ASE FOCoS process flow (2) |
4.5.7. | Pros and Cons of FOCoS chip last |
4.5.8. | ASE FOCoS chip last package characteristic |
4.5.9. | SPIL's advanced semiconductor packaging solutions |
4.5.10. | SPIL's advanced packaging solutions |
4.5.11. | SPIL Fan-Out Embedded Bridge (FOEB) Technology |
4.5.12. | SPIL FOEB Technology process flow |
4.5.13. | SPIL FOEB - Thermal and Warpage |
4.5.14. | SPIL FOEB-T |
4.5.15. | FO-EB-T Process flow |
4.5.16. | Performance benchmark: FOEB vs FOEB-T vs 2.5D Si interposer |
4.5.17. | SPIL FOEB vs Intel EMIB |
4.6. | Amkor's advanced semiconductor packaging solutions |
4.6.1. | Amkor advanced semiconductor packaging solutions |
4.6.2. | Amkor's 2.5D TSV FCBGA |
4.6.3. | Summary of Amkor's 2.5D TSV technologies |
4.6.4. | Stacked substrate (2.5D packaging) from Amkor |
4.6.5. | High-Density Fan-Out (HDFO) solution from Amkor |
4.6.6. | Amkor's S-SWIFT packaging solution (1) |
4.6.7. | Amkor's S-SWIFT packaging solution (2) |
4.6.8. | Amkor - RDL layers development |
4.6.9. | Electrical characteristics vs different RDL solution |
4.6.10. | Amkor's S-SWIFT package development status |
4.6.11. | Amkor - 3D stacking |
4.6.12. | Amkor - Cu-Cu Hybrid bonding pathfinding on the way |
5. | ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGING TECHNOLOGIES: APPLICATIONS |
5.1. | Introduction |
5.1.1. | Packaging trend for key markets |
5.2. | AI |
5.2.1. | Challenges for next generation AI chips |
5.2.2. | The rise and the challenges of LLM |
5.2.3. | Fundamentals of abundance data computing system |
5.2.4. | State-of-the-art high-end AI chips |
5.2.5. | Evolution of AI compute system architecture |
5.2.6. | NVIDIA and AMD solutions for next-gen AI |
5.2.7. | The next step forward to improve system bandwidth |
5.2.8. | How advanced semiconductor packaging can address the challenges? |
5.2.9. | Why traditional Moore's Law scaling can't meet the growing needs for HPC |
5.2.10. | Key Factors Affecting HPC Datacenter Performance |
5.2.11. | Advanced semiconductor packaging path for HPC |
5.2.12. | HPC chips integration trend - overview |
5.2.13. | HPC chips integration trend - explanation |
5.2.14. | Enhancing Energy Efficiency Through Hybrid Bonding Pitch Scaling |
5.2.15. | What is critical in packaging for AI&HPC |
5.2.16. | Case studies |
5.2.17. | 3D Chiplets stacking using hybrid bonding - Graphcore |
5.2.18. | AMD's Vision for Advanced Semiconductor Packaging |
5.2.19. | 3D chip stacking using hybrid bonding - AMD |
5.2.20. | 3D Chiplets stacking using hybrid bonding - AMD |
5.2.21. | AMD Instinct MI300 |
5.2.22. | Addressing Power Consumption Challenges in Expanding Computing System |
5.2.23. | Silicon photonics |
5.2.24. | Future system-in-package architecture |
5.3. | CPUs in data center servers and switches |
5.3.1. | Intel vs AMD for Server CPUs |
5.3.2. | Advanced semiconductor packaging for Intel latest Xeon server CPU (1) |
5.3.3. | Advanced semiconductor packaging for Intel latest Xeon server CPU (2) |
5.3.4. | AMD chip semiconductor packaging roadmap |
5.3.5. | Options for Integrating Multiple Chips |
5.3.6. | AMD's semiconductor packaging choices for chiplet integration |
5.3.7. | Future packaging trend for chiplet server CPU |
5.3.8. | Accelerators in data center servers and switches |
5.3.9. | Accelerators in servers |
5.3.10. | Server board layout - with accelerators (1) |
5.3.11. | Server board layout - with accelerators (2) |
5.3.12. | GPUs as data center accelerators |
5.3.13. | Computer memory hierarchy |
5.3.14. | HBM vs DDR for computing (1) |
5.3.15. | Drawbacks of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
5.3.16. | Summary of HBM vs DDR |
5.3.17. | HBM vs DDR for computing - market trend |
5.3.18. | HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) packaging |
5.3.19. | HBM packaging transition to hybrid bonding |
5.3.20. | Benchmark HBM performance |
5.3.21. | Approaches to package HBM and GPU |
5.3.22. | AMD new server GPU featuring new semiconductor packaging approach |
5.3.23. | AMD Elevated fanout bridge 2.5D |
5.3.24. | AMD patents GPU chiplet design for future graphics cards |
5.3.25. | AMD GPU memory choice for different applications |
5.3.26. | NVIDIA GPU for data centers |
5.3.27. | Computing modules with HBM (1) |
5.3.28. | Computing modules with HBM (2) |
5.3.29. | FPGA as data center accelerators |
5.3.30. | Server board layout - with FPGA accelerators |
5.3.31. | Intel FPGA packaging |
5.3.32. | Xilinx FPGA packaging |
5.3.33. | High-end commercial chips based on advanced semiconductor packaging technology (1) |
5.3.34. | High-end commercial chips based on advanced semiconductor packaging technology (2) |
5.3.35. | Summary |
5.4. | Co-Packaged Optics |
5.4.1. | The emergence of co-packaged optics (CPO) |
5.4.2. | Co-packaged optics for network switch |
5.4.3. | Pluggable optics vs CPO - 1 |
5.4.4. | Pluggable optics vs CPO - 2 |
5.4.5. | Optical dies integration for compute silicon |
5.4.6. | Thermal management for compute silicon |
5.4.7. | Future challenges in CPO |
5.4.8. | Co-packaging vs Co-packaged optics (CPO) |
5.4.9. | Co-packaged optics - package structure |
5.4.10. | Value proposition of CPO |
5.4.11. | Co-Packaged Optics (CPO), key for advancing switching and AI networks |
5.4.12. | Key technology building blocks for CPO |
5.4.13. | Key packaging components for CPO |
5.4.14. | Broadcom's CPO development timeline |
5.4.15. | Broadcom's CPO portfolio |
5.4.16. | Fan-Out Embedded Bridge (FOEB) Structure for Co-Packaged Optics |
5.4.17. | Glass-based Co-packaged optics - vision |
5.4.18. | Glass-based Co-packaged optics - Packaging structure |
5.4.19. | Glass-based Co-packaged optics - process development |
5.4.20. | Corning's 102.4 Tb/s test vehicle |
5.4.21. | Turn-Key solution required for CPO |
5.5. | Automotive |
5.5.1. | Future ADAS/Autonomous driving systems: requirements, actions, and current challenges |
5.5.2. | Three transformational pillars in automotive electronics |
5.5.3. | Autonomous vehicles (AVs) - an overview |
5.5.4. | The Automation Levels in Detail |
5.5.5. | Typical Sensor Suite for Autonomous Cars |
5.5.6. | The Coming Flood of Data in Autonomous Vehicles |
5.5.7. | High demand for computing power in autonomous vehicles |
5.5.8. | Semiconductor Content Increase in AVs |
5.5.9. | Autonomous driving platform - processors and chip packaging |
5.5.10. | The primary differentiators for AVs will be chip design and software |
5.5.11. | Autonomous driving platform - processors and packaging roadmap (1) |
5.5.12. | Autonomous driving platform - processors and packaging roadmap (2) |
5.5.13. | Chip design and packaging choice for AV computing processers from different suppliers |
5.5.14. | NVIDIA's AV computing modules for L5 automotive |
5.5.15. | Self-driving computing module packaging challenges |
5.5.16. | Autonomous vertical integration |
5.5.17. | Autonomous - packaging for sensors |
5.5.18. | Autonomous - packaging for sensors |
5.5.19. | Packaging for sensors in ADAS (1) |
5.5.20. | Packaging for sensors in ADAS (2) |
5.5.21. | Future Radar Packaging Choices |
5.5.22. | Radar IC packages |
5.6. | 5G&Beyond |
5.6.1. | Introduction to 5G |
5.6.2. | Mobile Telecommunication Spectrum and Network Deployment Strategy |
5.6.3. | Summary of Key 6G Activities and Future Roadmap |
5.6.4. | 5G Commercial/Pre-commercial Services by Frequency (2023) |
5.6.5. | 5G infrastructure |
5.6.6. | Different RAN architectures |
5.6.7. | Samsung's VRAN solution |
5.6.8. | Ericsson's cloud RAN solution |
5.6.9. | Open RAN deployment based on commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware |
5.6.10. | Ultra-low latency networks require accelerator card |
5.6.11. | Open RAN infrastructure arrangement |
5.6.12. | Software defined radio (SDR) |
5.6.13. | Massive MIMO (mMIMO) |
5.6.14. | Block diagram of MIMO antenna array system |
5.6.15. | Integration of digital frontend with transceivers |
5.6.16. | Si design for Open RAN radio (Analog Devices case) |
5.6.17. | Marvell baseband Si for 5G Open RAN radio |
5.6.18. | Marvell SoC for 5G networks (2) |
5.6.19. | Xilinx's Si solution for 5G radio unit (1) |
5.6.20. | Xilinx's Si solution for 5G radio unit (2) |
5.6.21. | End-to-end 5G silicon solutions from intel |
5.6.22. | Intel's FPGA for 5G radio (1) |
5.6.23. | Intel's FPGA for 5G radio (2) |
5.6.24. | The intentions of 5G system vendors enter Si battleground |
5.6.25. | 5G base station types: macro cells and small cells |
5.6.26. | 5G radios by MIMO size unit forecast 2022-2032 (Cumulative) |
5.6.27. | Estimating the total addressable market for advanced semiconductor packaging in 5G RAN infrastructure 2022-2032 (Cumulative) |
5.6.28. | Advanced semiconductor packaging unit for 5G RAN networks 2022-2032 (Cumulative) |
5.6.29. | 5G mmWave Antenna in Package (AiP) |
5.6.30. | Packaging trends for 5G and 6G connectivity |
5.6.31. | High frequency integration and packaging trend |
5.6.32. | Example: Qualcomm mmWave antenna module |
5.6.33. | High frequency integration and packaging: Requirements and challenges |
5.6.34. | Three ways of mmWave antenna integration |
5.6.35. | Technology benchmark of antenna packaging technologies |
5.6.36. | AiP development trend |
5.6.37. | Two types of AiP structures |
5.6.38. | Two types of IC-embedded technology |
5.6.39. | Two types of IC-embedded technology |
5.6.40. | Key market players for IC-embedded technology by technology type |
5.6.41. | University of Technology, Sydney: AME antennas in packages for 5G wireless devices |
5.6.42. | Additively manufactured antenna-in-package |
5.6.43. | Novel antenna-in-package (AiP) for mmWave systems |
5.6.44. | Design concept of AiP and its benefits (1) |
5.6.45. | Design concept of AiP and its benefits (2) |
5.6.46. | Stack-up AiP module on a system board |
5.6.47. | PCB embedding process for AiP |
5.6.48. | Section summary and remarks |
5.6.49. | LTCC AiP for 5G: TDK |
5.6.50. | Glass substrate AiP for 5G: Georgia Tech |
5.6.51. | Benchmark of low loss materials for AiP |
5.6.52. | 5G Aip summary |
5.6.53. | Phased-array antenna module design trend for 6G generations |
5.6.54. | 140 GHz Prototype From Samsung and UCSB - IC and Antenna Fabrication Details |
5.7. | Consumer electronics |
5.7.1. | Advanced semiconductor packaging technologies for consumer electronics |
5.7.2. | Commercialized high density fan-out packaging solutions |
5.7.3. | Samsung's new galaxy smartwatch |
5.7.4. | Packaging choices for packaging application processor environment (APE) in consumer electronics (1) |
5.7.5. | Packaging choices for packaging application processor environment (APE) in consumer electronics (2) |
5.7.6. | 3D packaging for APE in consumer electronics |
5.7.7. | Future packaging trend for APE in consumer electronics |
5.7.8. | Apple's M1 ultra for workstations uses TSMC's fan-out technologies |
5.7.9. | AMD Stacked 3D V-Cache technology for consumer desktop CPU |
5.7.10. | Intel mobile SoC for laptops (Lakefield) advanced semiconductor packaging |
5.7.11. | Advanced semiconductor packaging in Intel's next generation CPU Meteor Lake |
6. | MONOLITHIC 3D IC |
6.1. | From 2D system to Monolithic 3D IC (M3D) |
6.2. | The driving force for Monolithic 3D IC |
6.3. | 3D Integration technology landscape |
6.4. | Significantly improved interconnect density with M3D (1) |
6.5. | Significantly improved interconnect density with M3D (2) |
6.6. | Heterogenous 3D vs Monolithic 3D |
6.7. | What are the challenges in making monolithic 3D IC |
6.8. | 2D Materials for upper layer transistor in Monolithic 3D IC |
6.9. | CNTs for transistors |
6.10. | CNFET research breakthrough (1) |
6.11. | CNFET research breakthrough (2) |
6.12. | CNFET case study |
6.13. | Solutions? |
6.14. | Future applications of M3D |
6.15. | Future outlook and key takeaway |
7. | MARKET FORECAST SUMMARY |
7.1. | Data center server unit forecast 2022-2034 (shipment) |
7.2. | Total addressable data center CPU market forecast 2022-2034 (Shipment) |
7.3. | Data center CPU: advanced semiconductor packaging unit forecast 2022-2034 (shipment) |
7.4. | Total addressable data center accelerator market forecast 2022-2034 (Shipment) |
7.5. | L4+ Autonomous vehicles sales forecast 2022-2045 |
7.6. | Data center accelerator: advanced semiconductor packaging unit forecast 2022-2034 (shipment) |
7.7. | Total addressable ADAS processor & accelerator sales market for L4+ autonomous vehicles forecast 2022-2045 |
7.8. | 2.5D advanced semiconductor packaging unit sales for L4+ autonomous vehicles sales forecast 2022-2045 |
7.9. | 3D advanced semiconductor packaging unit sales for L4+ autonomous vehicles forecast 2022-2045 |
7.10. | Advanced semiconductor packaging unit forecast for APE in consumer electronics remarks |
7.11. | Unit sales forecast for smartphones/tablets/smartwatches/AR/VR/MR 2022-2034 |
7.12. | Advanced semiconductor packaging unit forecast for APE (application processor environment) in consumer electronics 2022-2034 (1) |
7.13. | Advanced semiconductor packaging unit forecast for APE (application processor environment) in consumer electronics 2022-2034 (2) |
7.14. | Global PC shipment forecast 2022-2034 |
7.15. | Advanced semiconductor packaging units in PC forecast 2022-2034 (1) |
7.16. | Advanced semiconductor packaging units in PC forecast 2022-2034 (2) |
7.17. | 5G radios by MIMO size unit forecast 2022-2034 (Cumulative) |
7.18. | Estimating the total addressable market for advanced semiconductor packaging in 5G RAN infrastructure 2022-2034 (Cumulative) |
7.19. | Advanced semiconductor packaging unit for 5G RAN networks 2022-2034 (Cumulative) |
8. | COMPANY PROFILES |