1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Three Key Takeaways for the Automotive Radar Market |
1.2. | Introduction to Automotive Radar |
1.3. | ADAS Applications Enabled by Front Radar |
1.4. | ADAS Applications Enabled by Side Radar |
1.5. | Growth in ADAS Availability Over the Past 20 years |
1.6. | Percentage of Vehicles Shipped With Key ADAS Features in 2022 |
1.7. | SAE Automation Levels Definition |
1.8. | Growth in Level 2 Deployment Since 2020 |
1.9. | Number of Radars Shipped per Vehicle |
1.10. | Number of Radars Used in SAE Levels 0, 1 & 2 |
1.11. | No of Sensors Required for Autonomous Cars - Level 0 to Level 4 and Robotaxis |
1.12. | The Need For and Emergence of Imaging Radar |
1.13. | 4D Radars and Imaging Radars |
1.14. | Existing 4D Imaging Radars on the Market |
1.15. | Vehicles Currently Using 4D Imaging Radars |
1.16. | Semiconductor Technology Trends in Radar |
1.17. | Future Radar Packaging Choices |
1.18. | Passenger Vehicle Sales Forecast by Region 2019-2044 |
1.19. | Autonomous Vehicles Forecast by SAE level 2022-2044 |
1.20. | Sensors for Autonomous Vehicles 2024-2044 |
1.21. | Radar Unit Sales for Different SAE Levels 2020-2044 |
1.22. | Regional Radar Sales 2020-2024 |
1.23. | Sales Revenue From Radar by SAE Level 2020-2044 |
1.24. | Company profiles |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | Radar - Radio Detection and Ranging |
2.2. | Typical Sensor Suite for Autonomous Cars |
2.3. | Radar |
2.4. | Sensors and their Purpose |
2.5. | Where does Radar Sit in the Sensor Trio? |
2.6. | ADAS Adoption by Region in 2022 |
2.7. | Functions of Autonomous Driving at Different Levels |
2.8. | ADAS and AV Key Terminologies |
2.9. | SAE Levels of Automation in Cars |
2.10. | Legislative Barriers for Private Autonomous Vehicles |
2.11. | Safety Mandated Features Driving Wider Radar Adoption |
2.12. | Typical Sensor Suites and the Purpose of Each Sensor |
2.13. | Quantity per Car - Level 2 |
2.14. | Sensors per Vehicle: Level 3 and Above |
2.15. | No More Medium Range Radar (MRR) |
2.16. | Occupant Detection |
2.17. | Radar Anatomy |
2.18. | Radar Key Components |
2.19. | Primary Radar Components - The Antenna |
2.20. | Primary Radar Components - the RF Transceiver |
2.21. | Primary Radar Components - MCU |
3. | REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE PROGRESS FOR PRIVATE VEHICLES |
3.1.1. | Why Regulating Autonomous Vehicles is Important for the Continued Growth of Radar |
3.1.2. | Privately Owned Autonomous Vehicles |
3.1.3. | Legislation and Autonomy |
3.2. | Europe |
3.2.1. | EU Mandating Level 2 Autonomy from July 2022 |
3.2.2. | Level 3 roll out in Europe (1) |
3.2.3. | Level 3 Roll Out in Europe (2) |
3.2.4. | Level 3 outlook in Europe |
3.2.5. | UNECE 2023 Update |
3.3. | US |
3.3.1. | Level 3, Legislation, US |
3.3.2. | Mercedes S-Class first level 3 car in US |
3.3.3. | Outlook for the US |
3.4. | China |
3.4.1. | Level 3, Legislation, China |
3.4.2. | Shenzhen Moves Towards Level 3 |
3.4.3. | Outlook for China |
3.5. | Japan |
3.5.1. | Private Autonomous Vehicles in Japan |
3.5.2. | World Overview |
3.5.3. | The Autonomous Legal Race |
4. | PRIVATE AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES |
4.1. | ADAS Features |
4.1.1. | ADAS Functions and Radar |
4.1.2. | IDTechEx's ADAS Feature Database |
4.1.3. | ADAS Adoption by Region in 2022 |
4.1.4. | ADAS Feature Deployment in the US |
4.1.5. | ADAS Feature Deployment in the China |
4.1.6. | ADAS Feature Deployment in EU + UK + EFTA |
4.1.7. | ADAS Feature Deployment in Japan |
4.1.8. | SAE Level Adoption by Region 2020 vs 2022 |
4.2. | Examples and Case Studies |
4.2.1. | Sensor Suite Disclaimer |
4.2.2. | Honda |
4.2.3. | Honda Legend - Sensor suite |
4.2.4. | Mercedes S-Class (2021), EQS (2022) |
4.2.5. | Mercedes S-class - Sensor Suite |
4.2.6. | Daimler/Bosch Autonomous Parking |
4.2.7. | Ford, VW and Argo AI |
4.2.8. | Audi |
4.2.9. | Case study - Audi A8 (2017) |
4.2.10. | Tesla |
4.2.11. | Tesla's Unusual Approach |
4.2.12. | Tesla's Sensor Suite |
4.2.13. | Super Cruise (GM) and BlueCruise (Ford) |
4.2.14. | Cadillac Escalade - Sensor suite |
4.2.15. | China - XPeng and Arcfox |
4.2.16. | Leaders |
4.2.17. | Private Vehicle Leaders |
4.3. | Sensors for Private Vehicles |
4.3.1. | Front Radar Applications |
4.3.2. | The Role of Side Radars |
4.3.3. | Front and Side Radars per Car |
4.3.4. | Total Radars per Car for Different SAE levels |
4.3.5. | Vehicle camera applications |
4.3.6. | E-mirrors, an emerging camera application |
4.3.7. | External Cameras for Autonomous Driving |
4.3.8. | Internal Cameras for Autonomous Driver Monitoring |
4.3.9. | LiDARs in automotive applications |
4.3.10. | LiDAR Deployment |
4.3.11. | Total Sensors For Level 0 to Level 4 and Robotaxis |
4.3.12. | Summary of Privately Owned Autonomous Vehicles |
4.4. | Key Player Analysis |
4.4.1. | State of Development |
4.4.2. | Waymo |
4.4.3. | Waymo Sensor Suite |
4.4.4. | Cruise |
4.4.5. | Cruise Sensor Suite |
4.4.6. | Waymo and Cruise's Ground Up Robotaxi Vehicles |
4.4.7. | AutoX |
4.4.8. | AutoX Sensor Suite |
4.4.9. | Baidu/Apollo |
4.4.10. | Baidu's Ground Up Robotaxi |
4.4.11. | Mobileye - One of the Most Significant Testers Not in California |
4.4.12. | Robotaxi Sensor Suite Analysis (1) |
4.4.13. | Robotaxi Sensor Suite Analysis (2) |
5. | TIER 1 RADARS, START-UP RADARS & TIER 2 TRANSCEIVERS |
5.1.1. | Radar Key Performance Indicators |
5.2. | Tier 2 - Transceivers |
5.2.1. | What is the Transceiver? |
5.2.2. | Texas Instruments - CMOS Transceiver with AOP |
5.2.3. | Texas Instruments Range of Integration |
5.2.4. | NXP - CMOS Transceiver |
5.2.5. | STMicroelectronics - SiGe Transceiver |
5.2.6. | Infineon - Moving Over to CMOS |
5.2.7. | Analogue Devices |
5.2.8. | Global Foundries - CMOS Partnership with Bosch |
5.3. | Tier 1 - Radars |
5.3.1. | Continental ARS540 - Product |
5.3.2. | Continental |
5.3.3. | Bosch |
5.3.4. | Denso |
5.3.5. | Hella |
5.3.6. | ZF - Future |
5.3.7. | Magna fails to acquire Veoneer, But Supplies Next Gen. Radar to Fisker |
5.3.8. | Other Tier 1s |
5.3.9. | Tier 1 Leaders and Laggards |
5.3.10. | Vertical Integration of Radar |
5.4. | New Radar Entrants |
5.4.1. | Table of Emerging Radar Players |
5.4.2. | Arbe |
5.4.3. | Arbe and its Investors |
5.4.4. | Sensrad - Bringing Arbe's Technology to New Markets |
5.4.5. | Mobileye |
5.4.6. | Metawave |
5.4.7. | Metawave and its Investors |
5.4.8. | Zadar |
5.4.9. | High Performance And Cost Effective Imaging Radar From Zendar |
5.4.10. | Software Enabled High Performance Radar With Spartan |
5.4.11. | Smart Radar System (SRS) |
5.4.12. | Vayyar - Chip Manufacturer |
5.4.13. | Oculii (Acquired in 2021) |
5.4.14. | Lunewave - 3D Printed Radar Antenna |
5.4.15. | Others |
5.4.16. | Funding for Radar Start-ups |
6. | PERFORMANCE TRENDS IN RADAR |
6.1.1. | IDTechEx Radar Trends Primary Research Method |
6.1.2. | Radar Trends: Volume and Footprint |
6.1.3. | Radar Trends: Packaging and Performance |
6.1.4. | Radar Trends: Increasing Range |
6.1.5. | Radar Trends: Field of View |
6.1.6. | Trading FOV with Range |
6.1.7. | Radar Trends: Angular Resolution (lower is better) |
6.1.8. | Radar Trends: Virtual Channel Count |
6.1.9. | Radar Trends: Virtual Channels and Resolution |
6.1.10. | Radars Limited Resolution |
6.1.11. | Two Approaches to Larger Channel Counts |
6.1.12. | Packaging and Integration Trends |
6.1.13. | Radar Trilemma |
7. | ROUTES TO 4D AND IMAGING RADAR |
7.1.1. | Why 4D and Imaging Radars are Needed |
7.1.2. | Difference between 4D and 4D Imaging Radar |
7.1.3. | The Rayleigh Criterion |
7.1.4. | Option 1 - Increase the Operating Frequency |
7.1.5. | Option 2 - Larger Aperture, Zendar |
7.1.6. | Plastic Omnium's Functionalized Bumper |
7.1.7. | Option 3 - Super-Resolution Software |
7.1.8. | Another Solution - Scanning |
7.1.9. | 4D Imaging Radar Examples |
7.1.10. | 4D Imaging Radar Benchmarking Method |
7.1.11. | 4D Imaging Radar Benchmarking Result |
7.1.12. | Deployments of 4D Imaging Radars |
8. | RADAR IN LOCALISATION |
8.1.1. | What is Localisation? |
8.1.2. | Localization: Absolute vs Relative |
8.1.3. | Main Methods of Localisation |
8.1.4. | Radar Mapping |
8.1.5. | Radar Localisation: Navtech |
8.1.6. | Radar Localisation: GPR (previously WaveSense) |
9. | TECHNOLOGY TRENDS WITHIN RADAR |
9.1. | Waveforms and MIMO |
9.1.1. | Introduction to Waveforms |
9.1.2. | Typical Performance with FMCW (single Tx/Rx) (1) |
9.1.3. | Typical Performance with FMCW (single Tx/Rx) (2) |
9.1.4. | Multiple Inputs, Multiple Outputs |
9.1.5. | Scaling up of MIMO |
9.1.6. | Oculii (acquired by Ambarella |
9.1.7. | Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing |
9.1.8. | Multiple Frequency Shift Key (MFSK) |
9.1.9. | Random/Noise/Digital Code Modulation |
9.1.10. | Uhnder - DCM MIMO Chip Developer |
9.2. | Frequency trends |
9.2.1. | Which Way is Frequency Going? |
9.2.2. | Applications of Different Frequencies |
9.2.3. | Applications of Different Frequencies |
9.2.4. | Automotive Radar Frequency Trends |
9.2.5. | Which Parameters Limit the Achievable KPIs |
9.2.6. | The Significance of |
9.2.7. | Example of High Frequency Radar Imaging |
9.2.8. | Packaging Benefits |
9.2.9. | Ranging |
9.2.10. | Surface Ice Detection |
9.2.11. | Radar Imaging at 300GHz from Fraunhofer |
9.2.12. | Adoption Path of High Frequency Radars |
9.2.13. | Challenges and Hurdles for High Frequency Radar |
9.2.14. | Regulation |
9.3. | Transceivers - Semiconductor Technologies and Cascading |
9.3.1. | The trend towards smaller transistors |
9.3.2. | Transceivers Semiconductor Trends: Power and Noise |
9.3.3. | Transceivers Semiconductor Trends: Power and Noise |
9.3.4. | Transceivers Semiconductor Trends: Virtual Channels |
9.3.5. | SiGe BiCMOS |
9.3.6. | CMOS |
9.3.7. | FD-SOI |
9.3.8. | The Future |
9.3.9. | Timeline |
9.3.10. | Automotive radar trending towards more advanced silicon |
9.4. | Radomes, Antennas, Materials and Board Trends |
9.4.1. | Importance of the Radome |
9.4.2. | Radome and Range |
9.4.3. | Ideal Radome Properties |
9.4.4. | Radome Shape Considerations |
9.4.5. | Preperm |
9.4.6. | Laird - Side Lobe Reduction Skirt Material |
9.4.7. | Radar Aesthetics, Form and Function |
9.4.8. | Other material considerations |
9.4.9. | Key Material Suppliers |
9.5. | Radar Material Selection and Benchmarking |
9.5.1. | Dielectric Constant: Benchmarking Different Substrate Technologies |
9.5.2. | Dielectric Constant: Stability vs Frequency for Different Organic Substrates |
9.5.3. | Dielectric Constant: Stability vs Frequency for Different Inorganic Substrates (LTCC, Glass) |
9.5.4. | Loss Tangent: Benchmarking Different Substrate Technologies |
9.5.5. | Loss Tangent: Stability vs Frequency For Different Substrates |
9.5.6. | Dielectric Constant and Loss Tangent Stability: Behaviour at mmWave Frequencies and Higher |
9.5.7. | Temperature Stability of Dielectric Constant: Benchmarking Organic Substrates |
9.5.8. | Moisture Uptake: Benchmarking Different Substrate Technologies |
9.6. | Antennas |
9.6.1. | Antenna Design |
9.6.2. | Patch Array Design |
9.6.3. | Patch Array in Practice |
9.6.4. | Phased Array Antennas |
9.6.5. | Metawave - Analogue Beamforming/Beam Steering |
9.6.6. | Echodyne |
9.6.7. | Lunewave - 3D Printed Antenna |
9.6.8. | Antenna Miniaturisation |
9.6.9. | Board Trends |
10. | RADAR MARKET, SUPPLIERS, SHARES, STRUCTURE, CHANGES |
10.1. | Availability of ADAS |
10.2. | Adoption of ADAS Driving Radar Growth |
10.3. | Level 3 Vehicles and Further Radar Adoption |
10.4. | Tesla and Subaru |
10.5. | Tier One Market Share by Volume - All Radars |
10.6. | Tier One Market Share by Revenue - All Radar |
10.7. | Tier One Market Share by Revenue - Front Radar |
10.8. | Top OEM Front Radar Choices |
10.9. | Front Radar Popularity by Region - US and EU + UK + EFTA |
10.10. | Front Radar Popularity by Region - China and Japan |
10.11. | Tier One Market Share by Revenue - Side Radar |
10.12. | Top OEM Side Radar Choices |
10.13. | Side Radar Popularity by Region - US and EU + UK + EFTA |
10.14. | Side Radar Popularity by Region - China and Japan |
10.15. | Radar Model Age |
10.16. | Most Popular Radar Models in US |
10.17. | Most popular radar models in EU + UK + EFTA |
11. | FORECASTS |
11.1. | Methodology - Autonomous Vehicles Report and Total Number of Radars |
11.2. | Methodology - Technology Splits |
11.3. | Addressable Market - Passenger Vehicle Sales Forecast by Region 2019-2044 |
11.4. | Addressable Market - Autonomous Vehicles Forecast by SAE level 2022-2044 |
11.5. | Forecasting Method: Sensors |
11.6. | Addressable Market - Sensors for Autonomous Vehicles 2022-2044 |
11.7. | Radar Unit Sales by SAE Level Forecast - 2020-2044 |
11.8. | Radar Unit Sales by Region Forecast - 2020-2044 |
11.9. | Radar Sales Revenue Forecast by SAE Level 2020-2044 |
11.10. | Radar Unit Sales Forecast in US by SAE Level 2020-2044 |
11.11. | Radar Unit Sales Forecast in China by SAE Level 2020-2044 |
11.12. | Radar Unit Sales Forecast in EU + UK + EFTA by SAE Level 2024-2044 |
11.13. | Radar Unit Sales Forecast in Japan by SAE Level 2020-2044 |
11.14. | Short-Range Radar Forecast by Virtual Channels 2020-2044 |
11.15. | Long-Range Radar Forecast by Virtual Channels 2020-2044 |
11.16. | Total Radar Market by No. Virtual Channels 2020-2044 |
11.17. | Radar Sales Proportionally by Frequency 2020-2044 |
11.18. | Radar Sales Proportionally by Semiconductor Technology 2024-2044 |
11.19. | Low-Loss Material Market Forecast for Automotive Radar 2020-2044 |
12. | COMPANY PROFILES |
12.1. | Arbe (2021) |
12.2. | Bosch (2021) |
12.3. | Continental - infrastructure radar |
12.4. | Continental (2021) |
12.5. | Fisker |
12.6. | Greenerwave |
12.7. | Kayaki Advanced Materials |
12.8. | Metawave |
12.9. | Mobileye |
12.10. | Mobileye (2021) |
12.11. | Nodar |
12.12. | NXP (2021) |
12.13. | Plastic Omnium |
12.14. | Pontosense |
12.15. | Sensrad |
12.16. | Smart Radar System |
12.17. | Spartan Radar |
12.18. | Uhnder |
12.19. | Waymo |
12.20. | Zadar Labs |
12.21. | Zendar |