This report has been updated. Click here to view latest edition.
If you have previously purchased the archived report below then please use the download links on the right to download the files.
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS |
1.1. | What is materials informatics? |
1.2. | Overview of significant industry activity |
1.3. | Latest key news and developments |
1.4. | AI opportunities at every stage of materials design and development |
1.5. | Problems with materials science data |
1.6. | Key areas of algorithm advancements |
1.7. | Materials informatics players - Categories |
1.8. | Conclusions and outlook for strategic approaches |
1.9. | Main players |
1.10. | Key partners and customers of external providers |
1.11. | Notable MI consortia |
1.12. | Project categories |
1.13. | Market forecast |
1.14. | Company Profiles |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | What is materials informatics? |
2.2. | Materials informatics - Why now? |
2.3. | What can ML/AI do in materials science? |
2.4. | Materials Informatics - Category definitions |
2.5. | The broader informatics space in science and engineering |
2.6. | Key challenges for MI across the full materials spectrum |
2.7. | Closing the loop on traditional synthetic approaches |
2.8. | High Throughput Virtual Screening (HTVS) |
2.9. | Advantages of ML for chemistry and materials science - Acceleration |
2.10. | Advantages of ML for chemistry and materials science - Scoping and screening |
2.11. | Advantages of ML for chemistry and materials science - Scoping and screening (2) |
2.12. | Advantages of ML for chemistry and materials science - New species and relationships |
2.13. | Data infrastructures for chemistry and materials science |
3. | TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT |
3.1. | Overview |
3.1.1. | Inputs and outputs of materials informatics algorithms |
3.1.2. | What is needed for materials informatics? |
3.1.3. | Summary of technology approaches |
3.1.4. | Uncertainty in experimental data undermines analysis |
3.1.5. | QSAR and QSPR: The role of regression analysis (1) |
3.1.6. | QSAR and QSPR: The role of regression analysis (2) |
3.2. | MI algorithms |
3.2.1. | Overview of MI algorithms |
3.2.2. | Descriptors and training a model |
3.2.3. | Types of MI algorithms - Supervised vs unsupervised |
3.2.4. | Problem classes in supervised and unsupervised learning |
3.2.5. | Reinforcement learning: Learning by trial and error |
3.2.6. | Describing materials to a computer |
3.2.7. | Automated feature selection |
3.2.8. | Exploitation vs exploration: Use what you know or look into new areas? |
3.2.9. | Pure exploitation vs epsilon-greedy policies in materials informatics |
3.2.10. | Active learning and MI: Choosing experiments to maximize improvement |
3.2.11. | Supervised learning models: "More sophisticated" is not always better |
3.2.12. | Bayesian optimization: A versatile tool in machine learning |
3.2.13. | Genetic algorithms: Mimicking natural selection |
3.2.14. | Unsupervised learning case study - Mapping phases |
3.2.15. | Generative vs discriminative algorithms - Explaining vs labelling |
3.2.16. | Generative algorithms in practice: Case study |
3.2.17. | Deep learning: Imitating the brain |
3.2.18. | Deep learning: Types of neural network |
3.2.19. | Deep learning: An example in MI |
3.2.20. | Generative models for inorganic compounds (I) |
3.2.21. | Generative models for inorganic compounds (II): Generative adversarial networks |
3.2.22. | How to work with small material datasets |
3.2.23. | Deep learning with small material datasets |
3.2.24. | Key areas of algorithm advancements |
3.3. | Establishing a data infrastructure |
3.3.1. | A data infrastructure is critical for MI |
3.3.2. | Developments targeted for chemical and materials science |
3.4. | External databases |
3.4.1. | Data repositories - Organizations |
3.4.2. | Leveraging data repositories |
3.4.3. | Text extraction and analysis |
3.4.4. | ChemDataExtractor V1.0: Data mining publications and patents |
3.4.5. | ChemDataExtractor V2.0: Mining relational data |
3.4.6. | Annotating and extracting the relevant information: The commercial space |
3.5. | MI with physical experiments and characterization |
3.5.1. | Achieving high-volumes of physical experimental data |
3.5.2. | Achieving high-volumes of physical experimental data (2) |
3.5.3. | High-throughput spectroscopy |
3.5.4. | In-situ spectroscopy developments |
3.6. | MI with computational materials science |
3.6.1. | Simulations for chemistry and materials science R&D |
3.6.2. | Density functional theory (DFT) - Quantum mechanical modelling for CAMD |
3.6.3. | Simulating matter across the length scale continuum: multiscale modelling |
3.6.4. | ICME and the role of machine learning |
3.6.5. | ICME: Why is it important? |
3.6.6. | QuesTek Innovations and ICME: from service to SaaS |
3.6.7. | Thermo-Calc and CompuTherm: ICME software provision and QuesTek collaboration |
3.6.8. | Generating and using the largest computational materials science database |
3.6.9. | Explorative design utilizing cloud-based simulation |
3.6.10. | The potential in leveraging quantum computing |
3.6.11. | Computation autonomy for materials discovery |
3.7. | Autonomous labs |
3.7.1. | The future - fully autonomous labs |
3.7.2. | The future - "Chemputer" |
3.7.3. | DeepMatter and the Chemputer |
3.7.4. | Workflow management for laboratory automation |
3.7.5. | Autonomous high throughput experimentation |
3.7.6. | Commercial self-driving-laboratories |
3.7.7. | Mobile autonomous robots in academia |
3.7.8. | Gearu: commercializing mobile autonomous robotic scientists |
3.7.9. | Retrosynthesis through to robot execution |
3.7.10. | Technology pillars for chemical autonomy |
4. | COMPANY ANALYSIS |
4.1. | Overview of significant industry activity |
4.2. | Latest key news and developments |
4.3. | Materials informatics players - categories |
4.4. | Conclusions and outlook for strategic approaches |
4.5. | Conclusions and outlook for strategic approaches |
4.6. | Materials informatics players - overview |
4.7. | Key partners and customers of external providers |
4.8. | Partnerships with engineering simulation software |
4.9. | Funding raised by private companies |
4.10. | The MI industry is in a growth phase |
4.11. | Signs of growth from major players |
4.12. | Lists of MI players |
4.13. | Full player list - Commercial companies (confirmed operational) |
4.14. | Full player list - Commercial companies (confirmed and likely industry leavers) |
4.15. | Company Profiles |
4.16. | Main players |
4.17. | Full player list - Public organizations (I) |
4.18. | Full player list - Public organizations (II) |
4.19. | Taking the operation in-house |
4.20. | Offering in-housed operations as a service |
4.21. | Taking the operation in-house: What needs to happen first? |
4.22. | Enthought: Digital transformation in scientific/engineering R&D |
4.23. | Retrosynthesis prediction: "Can I make this compound?" |
4.24. | Commercial retrosynthesis predictors |
4.25. | Notable MI consortia (1) - NIMS and Materials Open Platforms |
4.26. | Notable MI consortia (2) - Toyota Research Institute and university collaboration |
4.27. | Notable MI consortia (3) - The Global Acceleration Network |
4.28. | Notable MI consortia (4) - IBM collaborations |
4.29. | Notable MI consortia (5): ChiMaD and the CMD Network |
4.30. | Public-private collaborations |
4.31. | Materials Genome Initiative (MGI) |
4.32. | Materials Genome Engineering (MGE) |
4.33. | Additional key initiatives and research centres around the world |
4.34. | Materials development via synthetic biology |
5. | APPLICATIONS AND CASE STUDIES |
5.1. | Case studies - Overview |
5.2. | Market forecast |
5.3. | Materials informatics roadmap |
5.4. | Project categories |
5.5. | Materials informatics - Market penetration by maturity |
5.6. | Microscopy: Accelerating process and synthetic uses |
5.7. | Improving the use of synchrotron light sources |
5.8. | Aluminum and titanium alloys |
5.9. | Metallic glass alloys |
5.10. | Nickel-base superalloys |
5.11. | High-entropy alloys |
5.12. | Intermetallics |
5.13. | Coatings |
5.14. | Organic electronics |
5.15. | Organic electronics - RFID |
5.16. | Organic electronics - OPV |
5.17. | Organic electronics - Emerging areas |
5.18. | Catalysts (1) |
5.19. | Catalysts (2) |
5.20. | Catalysts (3) |
5.21. | Ionic liquids |
5.22. | Superconductors |
5.23. | Toxic chemicals and toxicity prediction |
5.24. | Energy storage: Lithium-ion batteries |
5.25. | Polymers and composites |
5.26. | Polymer Informatics |
5.27. | Lubricants and related areas |
5.28. | Thermoelectrics |
5.29. | Organometallics |
5.30. | 2D materials |
5.31. | Nanofabrication |
5.32. | Quantum Dots |
5.33. | Other nanomaterials |
5.34. | Metal-insulator transition compounds |
5.35. | Light absorbers and solar cells |
5.36. | Perovskite photovoltaics |
5.37. | Self-assembled monolayers |
5.38. | Metamaterials |
6. | COMPANY PROFILES |
6.1. | Alchemy Cloud |
6.2. | Ansatz AI |
6.3. | Citrine Informatics (2020) |
6.4. | Citrine Informatics (2022) |
6.5. | Cynora |
6.6. | Elix, Inc |
6.7. | Enthought |
6.8. | Exponential Technologies |
6.9. | Fluence Analytics |
6.10. | Intellegens (2019) |
6.11. | Intellegens (2020) |
6.12. | Kebotix (2020) |
6.13. | Kebotix (2022) |
6.14. | Kyulux |
6.15. | MaterialsIn |
6.16. | Materials Zone (2020) |
6.17. | Materials Zone (2022) |
6.18. | Matmerize |
6.19. | META |
6.20. | OTI Lumionics |
6.21. | Phaseshift Technologies |
6.22. | Polymerize |
6.23. | QuesTek Innovations LLC |
6.24. | Schrödinger |
6.25. | Stoicheia |
6.26. | Uncountable (2020) |
6.27. | Uncountable (2022) |
6.28. | Xinterra |
6.29. | Zymergen |
Slides | 205 |
---|---|
Forecasts to | 2033 |
ISBN | 9781915514332 |