1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Why carbon dioxide removal (CDR)? |
1.2. | What is CDR and how is it different from CCUS? |
1.3. | The CDR technologies covered in this report (1/2) |
1.4. | The CDR technologies covered in this report (2/2) |
1.5. | The CDR business model and its challenges |
1.6. | Monitoring, reporting, and verification of CDR |
1.7. | What is needed to further develop the CDR sector? |
1.8. | CDR technology benchmarking |
1.9. | The potential of DACCS as a CDR solution |
1.10. | The DACCS market is nascent but growing |
1.11. | Direct air capture company landscape |
1.12. | DACCS: key messages |
1.13. | Biomass with carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) |
1.14. | The status and outlook of BECCS |
1.15. | Biochar and bio-oil |
1.16. | The state of the biochar market |
1.17. | Afforestation and reforestation (A/R) |
1.18. | Forestry offset credits are a large opportunity for CDR |
1.19. | Mineralization-based NETs |
1.20. | Ocean-based NETs |
1.21. | Carbon dioxide removal: Key messages |
1.22. | CO2 removal volume capacity forecast (Mtpa) |
1.23. | CO2 removal revenue forecast (million USD) |
1.24. | CDR market forecast: Key messages |
2. | INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL ANALYSIS |
2.1.1. | What is carbon dioxide removal (CDR)? |
2.1.2. | Description of the main CDR methods |
2.1.3. | Why carbon dioxide removal (CDR)? |
2.1.4. | What is the difference between CDR and CCUS? |
2.1.5. | The cost and abatement potential of NETs |
2.1.6. | CDR technology benchmarking |
2.1.7. | Status and potential of CDR technologies |
2.1.8. | How expensive is CDR today? |
2.1.9. | Current CDR price by company and technology |
2.1.10. | Potential non-carbon revenue streams of various CDR technologies |
2.1.11. | Geological storage is not the only permanent destination for CO₂ |
2.1.12. | The challenge of permanence in CDR |
2.1.13. | Monitoring, reporting, and verification of CDR |
2.1.14. | The role of policy on CDR deployment |
2.1.15. | CDR: deferring the problem? |
2.1.16. | What is needed to further develop the CDR sector? |
2.2. | Latest developments in the CDR industry |
2.2.1. | The CDR market is gaining traction |
2.2.2. | CDR initiatives launched at COP26 |
2.2.3. | The Xprize Carbon Removal: start-ups by technology |
2.3. | The carbon dioxide removal market |
2.3.1. | Carbon removal vs emission reduction offsets (1/2) |
2.3.2. | Carbon removal vs emission reduction offsets (2/2) |
2.3.3. | The state of CDR in the voluntary carbon market |
2.3.4. | The carbon removal market potential |
2.3.5. | Advanced market commitment in CDR |
2.3.6. | What characterizes a high-quality CDR offset? |
2.3.7. | The role of carbon registries in the offset market |
2.3.8. | Challenges in today's carbon market |
2.3.9. | CDR technologies: key takeaways |
3. | DIRECT AIR CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE (DACCS) |
3.1. | Introduction to direct air capture (DAC) |
3.1.1. | What is direct air capture (DAC)? |
3.1.2. | Why DACCS as a CDR solution? |
3.1.3. | The state of the DAC market |
3.1.4. | Momentum: private investments in DAC |
3.1.5. | Momentum: public investment and policy support for DAC |
3.1.6. | Momentum: DAC leads investor interest in CDR |
3.1.7. | Momentum: DAC-specific regulation |
3.1.8. | DAC land requirement is an advantage |
3.1.9. | DAC vs point-source carbon capture |
3.2. | DAC technologies |
3.2.1. | Direct air capture technologies |
3.2.2. | Liquid solvent-based DAC and alkali looping regeneration |
3.2.3. | DAC solid sorbent swing adsorption processes (1/2) |
3.2.4. | DAC solid sorbent swing adsorption processes (2/2) |
3.2.5. | Electro-swing adsorption of CO₂ for DAC |
3.2.6. | Solid sorbents in DAC |
3.2.7. | Emerging solid sorbent materials for DAC |
3.2.8. | Solid sorbent- vs liquid solvent-based DAC |
3.3. | DAC companies |
3.3.1. | Direct air capture companies |
3.3.2. | Direct air capture company landscape |
3.3.3. | Climeworks |
3.3.4. | Carbon Engineering |
3.3.5. | Global Thermostat |
3.3.6. | A comparison of the main DAC companies |
3.3.7. | CarbonCapture Inc. |
3.3.8. | Verdox |
3.3.9. | Mission Zero Technologies |
3.3.10. | Noya |
3.3.11. | Soletair Power |
3.3.12. | Hydrocell |
3.3.13. | Carbyon |
3.3.14. | Sustaera |
3.3.15. | Infinitree |
3.3.16. | Skytree |
3.3.17. | Prometheus Fuels |
3.4. | DAC challenges |
3.4.1. | Challenges associated with DAC technology (1/2) |
3.4.2. | Challenges associated with DAC technology (2/2) |
3.4.3. | DACCS co-location with geothermal energy |
3.4.4. | Will DAC be deployed in time to make a difference? |
3.4.5. | What can DAC learn from the wind and solar industries' scale-up? |
3.4.6. | What is needed for DAC to achieve the gigatonne capacity by 2050? |
3.5. | DAC economics |
3.5.1. | The economics of DAC |
3.5.2. | The CAPEX of DAC |
3.5.3. | The CAPEX of DAC: sub-system contribution |
3.5.4. | The OPEX of DAC |
3.5.5. | Levelized cost of DAC |
3.5.6. | Financing DAC |
3.5.7. | DACCS SWOT analysis |
3.5.8. | DACCS: summary |
3.5.9. | DACCS: key takeaways |
4. | BIOMASS WITH CARBON REMOVAL AND STORAGE (BICRS) |
4.1.1. | Biomass with carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) |
4.1.2. | BiCRS possible feedstocks |
4.1.3. | BiCRS conversion pathways |
4.1.4. | CO₂ capture technologies for BiCRS |
4.1.5. | The potential for BiCRS goes beyond BECCS |
4.1.6. | TRL of BiCRS processes and products by feedstock |
4.1.7. | TRL of BiCRS by feedstock: lignocellulose |
4.1.8. | TRL of BiCRS by feedstock: organic wastes and oil crops/waste |
4.1.9. | TRL of BiCRS by feedstock: algae and sugar/starch |
4.1.10. | TRL of BiCRS: discussion |
4.1.11. | The economics of BiCRS |
4.1.12. | The cost of BiCRS as it scales |
4.1.13. | Considerations in large-scale BiCRS deployment |
4.2. | Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) |
4.2.1. | Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) |
4.2.2. | Opportunities in BECCS: heat generation |
4.2.3. | Opportunities in BECCS: waste-to-energy |
4.2.4. | BECCUS current status |
4.2.5. | Trends in BECCUS projects (1/2) |
4.2.6. | Trends in BECCUS projects (2/2) |
4.2.7. | The challenges of BECCS |
4.2.8. | What is the business model for BECCS? |
4.2.9. | The energy and carbon efficiency of BECCS |
4.2.10. | Is BECCS sustainable? (1/2) |
4.2.11. | Is BECCS sustainable? (2/2) |
4.2.12. | Network connecting bioethanol plants for BECCS |
4.2.13. | Biorecro |
4.2.14. | BECCS for hydrogen production and carbon removal |
4.2.15. | What is biochar? |
4.3. | Biochar and bio-oil |
4.3.1. | How is biochar produced? (1/2) |
4.3.2. | How is biochar produced? (2/2) |
4.3.3. | Biochar feedstocks |
4.3.4. | Biochar applications |
4.3.5. | Economic considerations in biochar production |
4.3.6. | Biochar: market and business model |
4.3.7. | The state of the biochar market |
4.3.8. | Key players in biochar by technology readiness level |
4.3.9. | Certified biochar players |
4.3.10. | Takachar |
4.3.11. | Drivers and barriers to biochar market uptake |
4.3.12. | Biochar: key takeaways |
4.4. | Other BiCRS solutions |
4.4.1. | Bio-oil geological storage for CDR |
4.4.2. | Bio-oil-based CDR: pros and cons |
4.4.3. | Wood harvesting and storage (WHS) as a CDR tool |
4.4.4. | Bio-based construction materials as a CDR tool |
4.4.5. | BiCRS company landscape |
4.4.6. | BiCRS: key takeaways |
5. | NATURE-BASED CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL |
5.1. | Introduction |
5.2. | Land-based carbon dioxide removal |
5.2.1. | Why land-based carbon dioxide removal? |
5.3. | Land-based CDR: afforestation and reforestation |
5.3.1. | The CDR potential of afforestation and reforestation |
5.3.2. | The case for and against A/R for climate mitigation |
5.3.3. | Technologies in A/R: remote sensing |
5.3.4. | Robotics: forestry mapping with drones |
5.3.5. | Other companies applying robotics to A/R |
5.3.6. | Robotic foresters |
5.3.7. | Automation in forest fire detection |
5.3.8. | Photosynthesis enhancement |
5.3.9. | Forest carbon projects for carbon offset credits |
5.3.10. | Comparing A/R and BECCS solutions |
5.3.11. | Afforestation and reforestation: key takeaways |
5.4. | Land-based CDR: soil carbon sequestration |
5.4.1. | What is soil carbon sequestration (SCS)? |
5.4.2. | The soil carbon sequestration potential is vast |
5.4.3. | Agricultural management practices to improve soil carbon sequestration |
5.4.4. | Challenges in SCS deployment |
5.4.5. | The soil carbon sequestration value chain |
5.4.6. | The soil carbon sequestration value chain: the roles |
5.4.7. | Marketplaces for SCS-based CDR credits |
5.4.8. | Propagate Ventures |
5.4.9. | Soil carbon sequestration pros and cons |
5.4.10. | Soil carbon sequestration: key takeaways |
5.5. | Mineralization-based CDR |
5.5.1. | CO₂ mineralization is key for CDR |
5.5.2. | Ex situ mineralization CDR methods |
5.5.3. | Source materials for ex situ mineralization |
5.5.4. | Ex situ carbonation of mineral wastes |
5.5.5. | R&D developments in ex situ carbonation of mineral wastes |
5.5.6. | Carbin Minerals |
5.5.7. | Oxide looping |
5.5.8. | Heirloom |
5.5.9. | Enhanced weathering |
5.5.10. | Enhanced weathering attributes |
5.5.11. | Key companies in enhanced weathering |
5.5.12. | Mineralization: key takeaways |
5.6. | Ocean-based carbon dioxide removal |
5.6.1. | Why ocean-based CDR? |
5.6.2. | Ocean-based CDR methods |
5.7. | Ocean-based CDR: abiotic methods |
5.7.1. | Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) |
5.7.2. | Ocean alkalinity enhancement status |
5.7.3. | Direct ocean capture (DOC) or electrochemical ocean CDR |
5.7.4. | Direct ocean capture: economics and status |
5.7.5. | Key players in electrochemical ocean CDR methods |
5.7.6. | Captura |
5.7.7. | Artificial downwelling |
5.8. | Ocean-based CDR: biotic methods |
5.8.1. | Coastal blue carbon |
5.8.2. | Algal cultivation |
5.8.3. | Ocean fertilization |
5.8.4. | Artificial upwelling |
5.8.5. | Key biotic ocean-based CDR players |
5.8.6. | Running Tide |
5.8.7. | CarbonWave |
5.8.8. | The governance challenge in large-scale deployment of ocean CDR |
5.8.9. | Ocean-based CDR: key takeaways |
6. | CDR MARKET FORECASTS |
6.1. | Forecasting methodology and assumptions (1/2) |
6.2. | Forecasting methodology and assumptions (2/2) |
6.3. | Price estimate methodology |
6.4. | CDR price forecast (US$/tCO₂) |
6.5. | CO₂ removal volume capacity forecast (Mtpa) |
6.6. | CO₂ removal revenue forecast (million USD) |
6.7. | Engineered vs nature-based CDR: volume and revenue forecast |
6.8. | CDR market forecast overall discussion |
6.9. | DACCS removal capacity forecast (Mtpa) |
6.10. | DACCS revenue forecast (million USD) |
6.11. | DACCS market forecast discussion (1/2) |
6.12. | DACCS market forecast discussion (1/2) |
6.13. | BECCS removal capacity forecast (Mtpa) |
6.14. | Biochar and bio-oil removal capacity forecast (Mtpa) |
6.15. | BiCRS revenue forecast (million USD) |
6.16. | BiCRS market forecast discussion (1/2) |
6.17. | BiCRS market forecast discussion (2/2) |
6.18. | Land-based CDR retired volumes forecast (Mtpa) and corresponding revenues (million USD) |
6.19. | Land-based CDR market forecast discussion |
6.20. | Ex-situ mineralization removal capacity forecast (Mtpa) and corresponding revenues (million USD) |
6.21. | Ex-situ mineralization market forecast discussion |
6.22. | Ocean-based CDR capacity forecast (Mtpa) and corresponding revenues (million USD) |
6.23. | Ocean-based CDR market forecast discussion |
6.24. | CDR volume forecast data table (Mtpa) |
6.25. | CDR revenue forecast data table (million USD) |
7. | APPENDIX |
7.1. | Direct air capture projects operational and announced globally (1/3) |
7.2. | Direct air capture projects operational and announced globally (2/3) |
7.3. | Direct air capture projects operational and announced globally (3/3) |
7.4. | Direct air capture companies (1/2) |
7.5. | Direct air capture companies (2/2) |
7.6. | Operational and planned BiCRS projects globally (1/3) |
7.7. | Operational and planned BiCRS projects globally (2/3) |
7.8. | Operational and planned BiCRS projects globally (3/3) |